Lakelands Counts Logo
Home > Community Dashboard > Custom Dashboard

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Additional Search Options
Clear all search filters

Search Results:

Save a link to this search
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 14.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Abbeville has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Abbeville has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Greenwood has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, McCormick has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), McCormick has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saluda has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Saluda has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Abbeville

Current Value:

Census Place: Abbeville

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Abbeville has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Abbeville has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Abbeville has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Abbeville has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Antreville

Current Value:

Census Place: Antreville

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Antreville has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Antreville has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Antreville has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Antreville has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Batesburg-Leesville

Current Value:

Census Place: Batesburg-Leesville

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Batesburg-Leesville has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Batesburg-Leesville has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), Batesburg-Leesville has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Batesburg-Leesville has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Bradley

Current Value:

Census Place: Bradley

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Bradley has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bradley has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Bradley has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Bradley has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Calhoun Falls

Current Value:

Census Place: Calhoun Falls

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Calhoun Falls has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calhoun Falls has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Calhoun Falls has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Calhoun Falls has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Clarks Hill

Current Value:

Census Place: Clarks Hill

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Clarks Hill has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clarks Hill has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Clarks Hill has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Clarks Hill has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Cokesbury

Current Value:

Census Place: Cokesbury

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Cokesbury has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cokesbury has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Cokesbury has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Cokesbury has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Coronaca

Current Value:

Census Place: Coronaca

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Coronaca has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Coronaca has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Coronaca has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Coronaca has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Donalds

Current Value:

Census Place: Donalds

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Donalds has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Donalds has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Donalds has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Donalds has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Due West

Current Value:

Census Place: Due West

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Due West has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Due West has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Due West has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Due West has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Greenwood

Current Value:

Census Place: Greenwood

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Greenwood has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Greenwood has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Greenwood has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Greenwood has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hodges

Current Value:

Census Place: Hodges

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Hodges has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hodges has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Hodges has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hodges has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Honea Path

Current Value:

Census Place: Honea Path

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Honea Path has a value of 15.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Honea Path has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Honea Path has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Honea Path has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lake Secession

Current Value:

Census Place: Lake Secession

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Lake Secession has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Secession has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Lake Secession has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lake Secession has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lowndesville

Current Value:

Census Place: Lowndesville

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Lowndesville has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lowndesville has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Lowndesville has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lowndesville has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: McCormick

Current Value:

Census Place: McCormick

17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, McCormick has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, McCormick has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), McCormick has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), McCormick has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Modoc

Current Value:

Census Place: Modoc

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Modoc has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Modoc has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Modoc has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Modoc has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Monetta

Current Value:

Census Place: Monetta

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Monetta has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Monetta has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), Monetta has a value of 14.3%.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Monetta has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Mount Carmel

Current Value:

Census Place: Mount Carmel

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Mount Carmel has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mount Carmel has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Mount Carmel has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Mount Carmel has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ninety Six

Current Value:

Census Place: Ninety Six

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Ninety Six has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ninety Six has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Ninety Six has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Ninety Six has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Parksville

Current Value:

Census Place: Parksville

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Parksville has a value of 15.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Parksville has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Parksville has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Parksville has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Plum Branch

Current Value:

Census Place: Plum Branch

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Plum Branch has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Plum Branch has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Plum Branch has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Plum Branch has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Promised Land

Current Value:

Census Place: Promised Land

10.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Promised Land has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Promised Land has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Promised Land has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Promised Land has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ridge Spring

Current Value:

Census Place: Ridge Spring

12.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Ridge Spring has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ridge Spring has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), Ridge Spring has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Ridge Spring has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Saluda

Current Value:

Census Place: Saluda

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Saluda has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saluda has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), Saluda has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Saluda has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Troy

Current Value:

Census Place: Troy

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Troy has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Troy has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Troy has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Troy has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ward

Current Value:

Census Place: Ward

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Ward has a value of 16.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ward has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), Ward has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Ward has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ware Shoals

Current Value:

Census Place: Ware Shoals

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Ware Shoals has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ware Shoals has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), Ware Shoals has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), Ware Shoals has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Ware Shoals has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Willington

Current Value:

Census Place: Willington

13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Places, Willington has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
SC Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willington has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), Willington has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Willington has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29129

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29129

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29129 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29129 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 29129 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29129 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29138

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29138

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29138 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29138 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 29138 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29138 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29166

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29166

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29166 has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29166 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 29166 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29166 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29620

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29620

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29620 has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29620 has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 29620 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29620 has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29628

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29628

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29628 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29628 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 29628 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29628 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29638

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29638

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29638 has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29638 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 29638 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29638 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29639

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29639

17.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29639 has a value of 17.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29639 has a value of 17.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 29639 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29639 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29646

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29646

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29646 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29646 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29646 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29646 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29649

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29649

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29649 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29649 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29649 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29649 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29653

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29653

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29653 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29653 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29653 has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29653 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29659

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29659

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29659 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29659 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 29659 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29659 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29666

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29666

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29666 has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29666 has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29666 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29666 has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29819

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29819

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29819 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29819 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29819 has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29819 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29821

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29821

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29821 has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29821 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29821 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29821 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29835

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29835

11.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29835 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29835 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29835 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29835 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29838

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29838

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29838 has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29838 has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29838 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29838 has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29840

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29840

12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29840 has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29840 has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29840 has a value of 12.3%.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29840 has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29844

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29844

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29844 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29844 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29844 has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29844 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29845

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29845

13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29845 has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29845 has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29845 has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29845 has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29848

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29848

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29848 has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29848 has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 29848 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29848 has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 29899

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29899

21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29899 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.8%.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 29899 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 29899 has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 29899 has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950100

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950100 has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950100 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950100 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950100 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950200

17.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950200 has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950200 has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950200 has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950200 has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950300

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950300 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950300 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950300 has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950300 has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950400

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950400 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950400 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950400 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950400 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950500

14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950500 has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950500 has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950500 has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950500 has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45001950600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45001950600

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45001950600 has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45001950600 has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Abbeville, SC County Value (14.5%), 45001950600 has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
Abbeville, SC County Value
(14.5%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45001950600 has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970101

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970101 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970101 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970101 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970101 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970102

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970102 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970102 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970102 has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970102 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970201

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970201 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970201 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970201 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970201 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970202

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970202 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970202 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970202 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970202 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970301

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970301 has a value of 16.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970301 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970301 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970301 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970302

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970302 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970302 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970302 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970302 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970400

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970400 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970400 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970400 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970400 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970500

11.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970500 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970500 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970500 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970500 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970600

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970600 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970600 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970600 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970600 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970701

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970701 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970701 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970701 has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970701 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970702

13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970702 has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970702 has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970702 has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970702 has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970800

12.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970800 has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970800 has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970800 has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970800 has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047970900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047970900

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047970900 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047970900 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047970900 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047970900 has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45047971000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45047971000

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45047971000 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45047971000 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Greenwood, SC County Value (13.6%), 45047971000 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Greenwood, SC County Value
(13.6%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45047971000 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45065920100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45065920100

10.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45065920100 has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45065920100 has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 45065920100 has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45065920100 has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45065920200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45065920200

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45065920200 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45065920200 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 45065920200 has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45065920200 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45065920300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45065920300

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45065920300 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45065920300 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the McCormick, SC County Value (12.3%), 45065920300 has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
McCormick, SC County Value
(12.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45065920300 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45081960100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45081960100

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45081960100 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45081960100 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 45081960100 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45081960100 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45081960201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45081960201

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45081960201 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45081960201 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 45081960201 has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45081960201 has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45081960202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45081960202

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45081960202 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45081960202 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 45081960202 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45081960202 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45081960300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45081960300

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45081960300 has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45081960300 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 45081960300 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45081960300 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 45081960400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 45081960400

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Census Tracts, 45081960400 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
SC Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 45081960400 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Saluda, SC County Value (14.3%), 45081960400 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Saluda, SC County Value
(14.3%)
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 45081960400 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Drink Excessively

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Drink Excessively

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Abbeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (18.1%), Abbeville has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Abbeville has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (16.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Over time, the Abbeville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (18.1%), Greenwood has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Greenwood has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (14.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Over time, the Greenwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Drink Excessively County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, McCormick has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (18.1%), McCormick has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), McCormick has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (13.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Over time, the McCormick value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Drink Excessively County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 15.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saluda has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (18.1%), Saluda has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Saluda has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (15.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Over time, the Saluda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

29.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 29.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 29.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (26.8), Greenwood has a value of 29.4 which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(26.8)
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Greenwood has a value of 29.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (29.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.1).
Prior Value
(24.1)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

64.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 64.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.5.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (64.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (70.0).
Prior Value
(70.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

88.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 88.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.5.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (88.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (93.0).
Prior Value
(93.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

0.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.5.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

41.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 41.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.5.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (41.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.0).
Prior Value
(40.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse Zip Code: 29138

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29138

77.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 29138 (77.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.0).
Prior Value
(73.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse Zip Code: 29620

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29620

78.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 29620 (78.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (98.0).
Prior Value
(98.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse Zip Code: 29646

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29646

124.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 29646 (124.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (153.0).
Prior Value
(153.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Abuse Zip Code: 29649

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29649

62.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 29649 (62.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43.0).
Prior Value
(43.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

210.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 210.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 269.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 405.8.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (210.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (181.0).
Prior Value
(181.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

556.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 556.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 269.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 405.8.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (556.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (477.0).
Prior Value
(477.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

88.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 88.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 269.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 405.8.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (88.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (57.0).
Prior Value
(57.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

89.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 89.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 269.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 405.8.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (89.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (100.0).
Prior Value
(100.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29138

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29138

117.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29138 has a value of 117.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29138 (117.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (122.0).
Prior Value
(122.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29620

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29620

295.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29620 has a value of 295.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29620 (295.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (247.0).
Prior Value
(247.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29638

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29638

258.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29638 has a value of 258.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29638 (258.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (286.0).
Prior Value
(286.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29646

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29646

711.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29646 has a value of 711.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29646 (711.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (654.0).
Prior Value
(654.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29649

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29649

408.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29649 has a value of 408.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29649 (408.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (337.0).
Prior Value
(337.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29653

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29653

592.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29653 has a value of 592.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29653 (592.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (343.0).
Prior Value
(343.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29666

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29666

569.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29666 has a value of 569.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29666 (569.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (535.0).
Prior Value
(535.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization rate due to Opioid Use Zip Code: 29819

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29819

776.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29819 has a value of 776.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 326.5 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 506.0.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29819 (776.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (657.0).
Prior Value
(657.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

708.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 708.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 796.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 600.3.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (708.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (672.0).
Prior Value
(672.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

1,391.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 1,391.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 796.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 600.3.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (1,391.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1,223.0).
Prior Value
(1,223.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

321.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 321.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 796.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 600.3.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (321.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (344.0).
Prior Value
(344.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

418.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 418.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 796.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 600.3.
SC Counties
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (418.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (421.0).
Prior Value
(421.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29129

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29129

736.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29129 has a value of 736.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29129 (736.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (772.0).
Prior Value
(772.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29138

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29138

436.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29138 has a value of 436.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29138 (436.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (447.0).
Prior Value
(447.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29166

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29166

2,550.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29166 has a value of 2,550.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29620

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29620

887.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29620 has a value of 887.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29620 (887.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (802.0).
Prior Value
(802.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29628

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29628

871.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29628 has a value of 871.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29628 (871.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (910.0).
Prior Value
(910.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29638

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29638

780.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29638 has a value of 780.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29638 (780.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (815.0).
Prior Value
(815.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29639

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29639

674.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29639 has a value of 674.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29639 (674.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (532.0).
Prior Value
(532.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29646

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29646

1,787.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29646 has a value of 1,787.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29646 (1,787.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1,668.0).
Prior Value
(1,668.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29649

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29649

928.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29649 has a value of 928.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29649 (928.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (773.0).
Prior Value
(773.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29653

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29653

1,720.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29653 has a value of 1,720.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29653 (1,720.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (922.0).
Prior Value
(922.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29666

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29666

1,025.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29666 has a value of 1,025.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29666 (1,025.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (993.0).
Prior Value
(993.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29819

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29819

1,401.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29819 has a value of 1,401.0 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29819 (1,401.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1,345.0).
Prior Value
(1,345.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Substance Disorders Zip Code: 29835

Current Value:

Zip Code: 29835

418.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 18+
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Zip Codes, 29835 has a value of 418.0 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 896.0 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 644.3.
SC Zip Codes
Compared to the prior value, 29835 (418.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (474.0).
Prior Value
(474.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

50.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Abbeville has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.6%), Abbeville has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(32.6%)
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Abbeville has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (50.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.1%).
Prior Value
(38.1%)
Over time, the Abbeville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

32.8%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 32.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 32.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.6%), Greenwood has a value of 32.8% which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(32.6%)
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Greenwood has a value of 32.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (32.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.4%).
Prior Value
(29.4%)
Over time, the Greenwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

25.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, McCormick has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.6%), McCormick has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(32.6%)
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), McCormick has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Over time, the McCormick value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

32.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saluda has a value of 32.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.6%), Saluda has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(32.6%)
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Saluda has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (32.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Over time, the Saluda value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

25.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 25.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Abbeville has a value of 25.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.2), Abbeville has a value of 25.9 which is lower and better.
SC Value
(32.2)
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Abbeville has a value of 25.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
Learn More
Save Card

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

37.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 37.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 37.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (32.2), Greenwood has a value of 37.9 which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(32.2)
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Greenwood has a value of 37.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Driving Under the Influence Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Driving Under the Influence Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Driving Under the Influence Arrest County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

348
Arrest
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (348) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (343).
Prior Value
(343)
Over time, the Greenwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drug Law Violations Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drug Law Violations Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Drug Law Violations Arrest County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

1,052
Arrest
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (1,052) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (831).
Prior Value
(831)
Over time, the Greenwood value is staying the same.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drunkenness Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drunkenness Arrest

Value
Compared to:

Drunkenness Arrest County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

126
Arrest
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (126) is less and better than the previously measured value (220).
Prior Value
(220)
Over time, the Greenwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health Behaviors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

24
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 24 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.
SC Counties
Learn More
Save Card

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

19
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 19 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.
SC Counties
Learn More
Save Card

Health Behaviors Ranking County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

17
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 17 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.
SC Counties
Learn More
Save Card

Health Behaviors Ranking County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

25
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 25 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.
SC Counties
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Liquor Store Density County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

12.2
Stores per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 12.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Abbeville has a value of 12.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (9.0), Abbeville has a value of 12.2 which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(9.0)
Compared to the US Value (10.6), Abbeville has a value of 12.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.6)
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (12.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.1).
Prior Value
(12.1)
Over time, the Abbeville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Liquor Store Density County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

13.0
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 13.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greenwood has a value of 13.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (10.2), Greenwood has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(10.2)
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Greenwood has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.7)
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (13.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.1).
Prior Value
(10.1)
Over time, the Greenwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Liquor Store Density County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

20.7
Stores per 100,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 20.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.4.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, McCormick has a value of 20.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (8.6), McCormick has a value of 20.7 which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(8.6)
Compared to the US Value (10.5), McCormick has a value of 20.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.5)
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (20.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Learn More
Save Card

Liquor Store Density County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

5.0
Stores per 100,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 5.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.4.
SC Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saluda has a value of 5.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the SC Value (8.6), Saluda has a value of 5.0 which is lower and better.
SC Value
(8.6)
Compared to the US Value (10.5), Saluda has a value of 5.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5)
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (5.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0).
Prior Value
(5.0)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: Abbeville

Current Value:

County: Abbeville

10.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Abbeville has a value of 10.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to the SC Value (6.5%), Abbeville has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(6.5%)
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Abbeville has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5%)
Compared to the prior value, Abbeville (10.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Over time, the Abbeville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: Greenwood

Current Value:

County: Greenwood

8.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Greenwood has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to the SC Value (6.5%), Greenwood has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
SC Value
(6.5%)
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Greenwood has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5%)
Compared to the prior value, Greenwood (8.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Over time, the Greenwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: McCormick

Current Value:

County: McCormick

6.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, McCormick has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to the SC Value (6.5%), McCormick has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(6.5%)
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), McCormick has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5%)
Compared to the prior value, McCormick (6.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Over time, the McCormick value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy County: Saluda

Current Value:

County: Saluda

4.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to SC Counties, Saluda has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
SC Counties
Compared to the SC Value (6.5%), Saluda has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
SC Value
(6.5%)
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Saluda has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.5%)
Compared to the prior value, Saluda (4.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Over time, the Saluda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
Learn More
Save Card
Lakelands Counts